PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXL vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 28.14% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 46.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 30.20%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.


SPXL

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.77%
YTD
28.14%
6M
26.88%
1Y
81.54%
3Y*
52.83%
5Y*
23.51%
10Y*
30.20%

TNA

1D
-4.11%
1M
9.08%
YTD
46.53%
6M
40.42%
1Y
118.36%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
-6.21%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
28.14%31.94%63.61%69.49%-56.55%98.75%9.64%102.80%-25.11%71.03%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
46.53%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXL and TNA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

0.85

The correlation between SPXL and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXL
TNA

Technology

8.5%
16.9%

Financial Services

2.6%
15.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
8.4%

Healthcare

1.9%
16.5%

Industrials

1.7%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
2.4%

Energy

0.8%
6.2%

Utilities

0.6%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.4%
6.2%

Basic Materials

0.4%
4.8%

Technology

SPXL
8.5%
TNA
16.9%

Financial Services

SPXL
2.6%
TNA
15.9%

Communication Services

SPXL
2.4%
TNA
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXL
2.2%
TNA
8.4%

Healthcare

SPXL
1.9%
TNA
16.5%

Industrials

SPXL
1.7%
TNA
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPXL
1.1%
TNA
2.4%

Energy

SPXL
0.8%
TNA
6.2%

Utilities

SPXL
0.6%
TNA
2.9%

Real Estate

SPXL
0.4%
TNA
6.2%

Basic Materials

SPXL
0.4%
TNA
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXL
SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXLTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.66

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

12.05

+0.89

SPXL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXL and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXLTNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.09

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.09

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.12

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.23

+0.30

Drawdowns

SPXL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXLTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-88.09%

+11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.77%

-32.53%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.95%

-65.78%

+16.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.80%

-82.36%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

-88.09%

+11.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-38.03%

+35.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-33.90%

+18.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.32%

9.86%

-3.54%

Volatility

SPXL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) is 8.49%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 17.14%. This indicates that SPXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXLTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

17.14%

-8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

40.25%

-13.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.39%

57.08%

-21.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.24%

67.31%

-17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.42%

68.42%

-15.00%

SPXL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than TNA's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
0.52%0.69%0.74%0.98%0.32%0.11%0.22%0.84%1.02%3.88%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.41%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXL and TNA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (17.14%) compared to SPXL (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 30.20% vs 7.85% for TNA. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 8.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 30.20% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.41% for TNA.

SPXL tracks S&P 500, while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 1.14% for TNA.

SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXL and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer