TNA vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TNA returned 10.05%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNA charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

TNA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 61.93% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.05%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.

TNA

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: 13.10%
• YTD: 61.93%
• 6M: 47.75%
• 1Y: 140.92%
• 3Y*: 33.72%
• 5Y*: -4.64%
• 10Y*: 10.05%

QQQ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 20.41%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 40.91%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	61.93%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-62.48%	27.88%	-7.82%	71.88%	-39.89%	39.15%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	20.41%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TNA and QQQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008	0.75

The correlation between TNA and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

TNA vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TNA	QQQ
Technology	19.1%	58.7%
Industrials	18.0%	2.6%
Healthcare	16.3%	3.7%
Financial Services	15.3%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	11.4%
Real Estate	5.9%	0.1%
Energy	5.4%	0.5%
Basic Materials	4.7%	1.0%
Utilities	2.7%	1.2%
Communication Services	2.4%	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	6.4%

Return for Risk

TNA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 71
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TNA	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.33	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.03	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	3.44	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.30	12.79	+1.51

TNA vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNA Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNA and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TNA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNA	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.09%	-82.97%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.53%	-11.96%	-20.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.78%	-22.77%	-43.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.36%	-35.12%	-47.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.09%	-35.12%	-52.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.52%	-0.99%	-30.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.92%	-32.73%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.89%	3.21%	+6.68%

Volatility

TNA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a higher volatility of 19.53% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that TNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNA	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.53%	8.47%	+11.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.57%	14.20%	+28.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.77%	17.67%	+41.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.55%	22.64%	+44.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.59%	22.43%	+46.16%

TNA vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNA has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than QQQ's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.49%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.37%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNA and QQQ in my portfolio?

TNA and QQQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TNA or QQQ?

TNA has higher volatility (19.53%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, TNA or QQQ?

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 10.05% for TNA. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TNA or QQQ?

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TNA or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TNA or QQQ?

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.37% for TNA.

What is the main difference between TNA and QQQ?

TNA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TNA and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.