SPXL vs. METU
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. SPXL is passively managed, while METU is actively managed. Over the past year, SPXL returned 65.66% vs -46.99% for METU. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for METU.
Performance
SPXL vs. METU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than METU's -34.42% return.
SPXL
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 65.66%
- 3Y*
- 47.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.80%
- 10Y*
- 29.90%
METU
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -17.10%
- YTD
- -34.42%
- 6M
- -31.54%
- 1Y
- -46.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL vs. METU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.98% | 31.94% | 26.63% |
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -34.42% | -1.01% | 28.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and METU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SPXL and METU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXL vs. METU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXL
METU
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPXL
METU
-
Financial Services
SPXL
METU
-
Communication Services
SPXL
METU
Consumer Cyclical
SPXL
METU
-
Healthcare
SPXL
METU
-
Industrials
SPXL
METU
-
Consumer Defensive
SPXL
METU
-
Energy
SPXL
METU
-
Utilities
SPXL
METU
-
Real Estate
SPXL
METU
-
Basic Materials
SPXL
METU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. METU — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
METU
SPXL vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.90 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | -0.77 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | -1.36 | +11.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than METU's maximum drawdown of -61.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and METU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -61.85% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -61.52% | +34.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -58.08% | +50.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -23.93% | +7.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | 34.46% | -27.97% |
Volatility
SPXL vs. METU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) is 13.20%, while Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a volatility of 20.46%. This indicates that SPXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.20% | 20.46% | -7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.79% | 54.04% | -25.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.81% | 70.96% | -34.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.44% | 72.35% | -21.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.50% | 72.35% | -18.85% |
SPXL vs. METU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than METU's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. METU - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than METU's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 4.71% | 3.00% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.56% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and METU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to SPXL (13.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs METU's -61.85%.
On 1-year performance, SPXL leads with 65.66% vs -46.99% for METU. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 13.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 65.66% return vs -46.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.
METU has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.56% for SPXL.
Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 1.07% for METU.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and METU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer