PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPX4.L vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPX4.L is traded in GBP, while IJH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJH values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPX4.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 15.07% return.


SPX4.L

1D
0.40%
1M
4.30%
YTD
13.69%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*

IJH

1D
0.44%
1M
3.93%
YTD
15.07%
6M
13.47%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
12.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPX4.L
SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF
13.69%0.12%14.37%10.71%-1.28%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
15.07%-0.23%15.91%10.59%-1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SPX4.L and IJH is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.64

The correlation between SPX4.L and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPX4.L vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPX4.L
SPX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPX4.LIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

3.44

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

12.41

+0.57

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPX4.L and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPX4.LIJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.86

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Drawdowns

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPX4.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX4.L and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPX4.LIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.24%

-37.62%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-8.01%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.24%

-25.31%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-6.29%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.22%

-0.18%

Volatility

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPX4.LIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.70%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

10.68%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

14.82%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

18.49%

+3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

20.80%

+1.66%

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPX4.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPX4.L vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

SPX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
SPX4.L
SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPX4.L and IJH have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPX4.L.

SPX4.L tracks Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPX4.L and 0.05% for IJH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPX4.L and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer