PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPX4.L
SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF
3.87%0.12%14.37%10.71%-1.28%
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
-0.63%13.85%19.99%17.54%-6.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPX4.L achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than VHVG.L's -0.63% return.


SPX4.L

1D
1.85%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
3.87%
6M
6.37%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
10Y*

VHVG.L

1D
2.15%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
3.35%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPX4.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPX4.L
SPX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPX4.LVHVG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

1.35

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.86

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.66

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.69

10.30

-4.61

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPX4.L and VHVG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPX4.LVHVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

1.35

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.77

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between SPX4.L and VHVG.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPX4.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPX4.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, roughly equal to the maximum VHVG.L drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX4.L and VHVG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPX4.LVHVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.24%

-25.41%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.82%

-9.88%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-3.89%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-3.35%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.79%

+0.59%

Volatility

SPX4.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) at 4.49%. This indicates that SPX4.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPX4.LVHVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.49%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

8.19%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

13.62%

+4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.79%

13.02%

+9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

15.17%

+7.62%