SPX4.L vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
SPX4.L and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPX4.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell Mid Cap TR USD. It was launched on Jan 30, 2012. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both SPX4.L and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPX4.L or XMHQ.
Key characteristics
| SPX4.L | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.87% | 20.92% |
| 1Y Return | 24.28% | 47.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.73 | 2.80 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.39% | 16.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.95% | -58.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.36% | -2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPX4.L and XMHQ is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SPX4.L vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPX4.L achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 20.92% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPX4.L vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPX4.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPX4.L vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPX4.L vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
SPX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPX4.L SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.60% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
SPX4.L vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPX4.L drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX4.L and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPX4.L vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) at 4.46%. This indicates that SPX4.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.