SPWO vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPWO (SP Funds S&P World ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SPWO tracks the S&P DM Ex-U.S. & EM 50/50 Shariah Index - Benchmark TR Net while EFAS tracks the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPWO returned 47.54% vs 28.75% for EFAS. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPWO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

SPWO vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P World ETF (SPWO) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPWO achieves a 26.98% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 13.06% return.

SPWO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 8.23%
• YTD: 26.98%
• 6M: 27.41%
• 1Y: 47.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 28.75%
• 3Y*: 24.51%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPWO vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPWO SP Funds S&P World ETF	26.98%	26.32%	9.25%	2.96%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	13.06%	46.83%	3.07%	1.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SPWO and EFAS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023	0.46

SPWO vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPWO	EFAS
Technology	48.9%	0.1%
Industrials	11.7%	9.9%
Healthcare	10.5%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	1.9%
Basic Materials	6.5%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	8.1%
Energy	2.0%	13.7%
Communication Services	0.7%	8.6%
Real Estate	0.6%	11.3%
Utilities	0.1%	14.4%
Financial Services	0.0%	30.1%

Return for Risk

SPWO vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPWO

SPWO Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SPWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SPWO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SPWO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 83
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPWO vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P World ETF (SPWO) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPWO	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.73	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.84	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	5.45	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.22	14.46	-1.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPWO vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPWO and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPWO	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.73	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	0.56	+0.88

Drawdowns

SPWO vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPWO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPWO and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPWO	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.03%	-44.38%	+26.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	-5.30%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-2.92%	+1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.79%	-7.07%	+4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	1.99%	+1.62%

Volatility

SPWO vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P World ETF (SPWO) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.76%. This indicates that SPWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPWO	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.55%	2.76%	+4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.56%	8.19%	+8.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.64%	10.57%	+9.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	15.59%	+3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.02%	18.33%	+0.69%

SPWO vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPWO vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

SPWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EFAS's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.72%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
SPWO SP Funds S&P World ETF	1.02%	1.29%	1.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPWO and EFAS in my portfolio?

SPWO and EFAS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPWO or EFAS?

SPWO has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to EFAS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPWO dropped -18.03% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, SPWO or EFAS?

On 1-year performance, SPWO leads with 47.54% vs 28.75% for EFAS. On fees, SPWO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPWO or EFAS?

Over the 1-year period, SPWO has performed better with a 47.54% return vs 28.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPWO or EFAS?

SPWO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPWO or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.02% for SPWO.

What is the main difference between SPWO and EFAS?

SPWO tracks S&P DM Ex-U.S. & EM 50/50 Shariah Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPWO and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.