PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUU vs. PWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUU vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's 25.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SPUU has outperformed PWB with an annualized return of 24.69%, while PWB has yielded a comparatively lower 18.33% annualized return.


SPUU

1D
1.20%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
15.56%
6M
15.85%
1Y
47.93%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
24.69%

PWB

1D
1.29%
1M
2.46%
YTD
25.98%
6M
26.73%
1Y
43.40%
3Y*
32.74%
5Y*
17.69%
10Y*
18.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUU vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
15.56%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
25.98%24.94%31.04%30.61%-25.81%19.58%31.89%24.68%0.88%30.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUU and PWB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.88

The correlation between SPUU and PWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUU vs. PWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUU
PWB

Technology

39.0%
48.9%

Financial Services

11.1%
9.2%

Communication Services

10.6%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
4.8%

Healthcare

8.3%
3.2%

Industrials

7.8%
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
7.4%

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.1%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.2%

Technology

SPUU
39.0%
PWB
48.9%

Financial Services

SPUU
11.1%
PWB
9.2%

Communication Services

SPUU
10.6%
PWB
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUU
9.9%
PWB
4.8%

Healthcare

SPUU
8.3%
PWB
3.2%

Industrials

SPUU
7.8%
PWB
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPUU
4.5%
PWB
7.4%

Energy

SPUU
3.1%
PWB

-

Utilities

SPUU
2.1%
PWB
1.6%

Real Estate

SPUU
1.8%
PWB

-

Basic Materials

SPUU
1.7%
PWB
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUU vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUU vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUUPWBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.50

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

14.63

-4.02

SPUU vs. PWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the PWB Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUU and PWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUU vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, which is greater than PWB's maximum drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and PWB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUUPWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-52.58%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-12.11%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

-22.10%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

-31.41%

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

-32.36%

-26.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-2.10%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-8.23%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

2.89%

+1.34%

Volatility

SPUU vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) have volatilities of 8.72% and 8.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUUPWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.72%

8.70%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.45%

16.70%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.81%

19.80%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.59%

21.23%

+12.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.83%

20.83%

+15.00%

SPUU vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUU vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.39%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUU and PWB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUU has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to PWB (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs PWB's -52.58%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.69% vs 18.33% for PWB. On fees, PWB is cheaper at 0.56% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.69% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PWB is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SPUU.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

SPUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PWB is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.56% for PWB.

PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUU and PWB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer