PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUS vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUS vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 13.75% return.


SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUS vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and SPYG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.97

The correlation between SPUS and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUS vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUS
SPYG

Technology

57.3%
51.9%

Healthcare

11.1%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
8.9%

Industrials

7.0%
5.0%

Communication Services

6.4%
16.8%

Energy

3.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.6%

Utilities

0.3%
1.2%

Financial Services

-

8.5%

Technology

SPUS
57.3%
SPYG
51.9%

Healthcare

SPUS
11.1%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUS
7.3%
SPYG
8.9%

Industrials

SPUS
7.0%
SPYG
5.0%

Communication Services

SPUS
6.4%
SPYG
16.8%

Energy

SPUS
3.3%
SPYG
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPUS
3.0%
SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPUS
2.9%
SPYG
1.0%

Real Estate

SPUS
1.4%
SPYG
0.6%

Utilities

SPUS
0.3%
SPYG
1.2%

Financial Services

SPUS

-

SPYG
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUS vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUS vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUSSPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.86

2.12

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

2.90

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.48

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.32

10.25

+6.07

SPUS vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUSSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.12

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.76

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.35

+0.56

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-67.63%

+36.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-13.76%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

-22.14%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

-32.67%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-1.13%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-24.33%

+18.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.32%

-0.85%

Volatility

SPUS vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.00%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.35%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

12.46%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

16.06%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

21.17%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

20.64%

+0.64%

SPUS vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUS vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SPUS and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 16.07% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.

SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUS and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer