SPUS vs. UMMA
Compare and contrast key facts about SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA).
SPUS and UMMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPUS is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019. UMMA is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2022. Both SPUS and UMMA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPUS or UMMA.
Correlation
The correlation between SPUS and UMMA is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPUS vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SPUS:
1.91
UMMA:
0.46
SPUS:
2.53
UMMA:
0.75
SPUS:
1.35
UMMA:
1.09
SPUS:
2.59
UMMA:
0.67
SPUS:
10.25
UMMA:
2.06
SPUS:
2.90%
UMMA:
3.69%
SPUS:
15.58%
UMMA:
16.61%
SPUS:
-30.80%
UMMA:
-34.17%
SPUS:
-2.51%
UMMA:
-9.32%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly higher than UMMA's 4.61% return.
SPUS
27.92%
2.59%
7.62%
28.34%
17.69%
N/A
UMMA
4.61%
-1.62%
-4.00%
6.11%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPUS vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPUS vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPUS vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than UMMA's 1.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.69% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 0.93% | 1.04% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPUS vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and UMMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPUS vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.04%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.