SPTS vs. GSIG
SPTS (SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF) and GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTS is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index, while GSIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPTS charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for GSIG.
Performance
SPTS vs. GSIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPTS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTS vs. GSIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 0.79% | 5.05% | 4.20% | 4.27% | -3.86% | -0.72% | 0.20% |
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTS and GSIG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SPTS and GSIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTS vs. GSIG — Risk / Return Rank
SPTS
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPTS vs. GSIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTS | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTS vs. GSIG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTS | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | — | — |
Volatility
SPTS vs. GSIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTS | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.70% | — | — |
SPTS vs. GSIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIG's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTS vs. GSIG - Dividend Comparison
SPTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than GSIG's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.00% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.88% | 3.99% | 4.25% | 3.61% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.70% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 1.20% | 0.95% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTS and GSIG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.
GSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 3.88% for SPTS.
SPTS is categorized as Government Bonds, while GSIG is Corporate Bonds. SPTS tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index, while GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTS and 0.14% for GSIG.
Find the right allocation for SPTS and GSIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer