PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTS vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTS vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTS achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than SCHO's 0.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPTS having a 1.64% annualized return and SCHO not far ahead at 1.72%.


SPTS

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.75%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.64%
ALL TIME*
1.44%

SCHO

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.04%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.72%
ALL TIME*
1.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$59.23M$61.44M$84.14M
$23.39M$28.59M$39.91M

SPTS vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
0.75%5.05%4.20%4.27%-3.86%-0.72%3.23%3.56%1.08%0.59%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.79%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTS and SCHO is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011

0.70

The correlation between SPTS and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTS vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPTS vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTSSCHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.66

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

15.34

-0.70

SPTS vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTS and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTS vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTS drawdown since its inception was -5.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTS and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTSSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-5.69%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

-0.86%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

-0.98%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

-5.69%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

-5.69%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.04%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-0.61%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.20%

+0.01%

Volatility

SPTS vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) has a higher volatility of 0.41% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.37%. This indicates that SPTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTSSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

0.37%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

1.03%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34%

1.41%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.00%

2.00%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.70%

1.56%

+0.14%

SPTS vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPTS and SCHO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPTS vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

SPTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, which matches SCHO's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.53%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.54%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPTS and SCHO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPTS has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to SCHO (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTS dropped -5.83% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

On 10-year performance, SCHO leads with 1.72% vs 1.64% for SPTS. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHO has performed better with a 1.72% return vs 1.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS and SCHO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SPTS has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.53% for SCHO.

SPTS tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab.

SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTS and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer