SPTS vs. SHY
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY).
SPTS and SHY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPTS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (1-3 Y) (Inception 4/30/1996). It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. SHY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2002. Both SPTS and SHY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPTS or SHY.
Key characteristics
| SPTS | SHY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| 1Y Return | 2.28% | 2.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.11% | -0.18% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.03% | 0.95% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.05% | 0.90% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.23 | 1.22 |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.11% | 2.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.83% | -5.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.52% | -0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTS and SHY is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SPTS vs. SHY - Performance Comparison
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SPTS at 0.03% and SHY at 0.03%. Over the past 10 years, SPTS has outperformed SHY with an annualized return of 1.05%, while SHY has yielded a comparatively lower 0.90% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPTS vs. SHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTS has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SHY's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPTS vs. SHY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPTS vs. SHY - Dividend Comparison
SPTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than SHY's 3.43% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 4.05% | 3.61% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.70% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 1.20% | 0.95% | 0.83% | 0.68% | 0.43% |
SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.43% | 2.99% | 1.30% | 0.26% | 0.94% | 2.12% | 1.72% | 0.98% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.36% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
SPTS vs. SHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTS drawdown since its inception was -5.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SHY drawdown of -5.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTS and SHY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPTS vs. SHY - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) at 0.59%. This indicates that SPTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.