SPTM vs. THLV
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV).
SPTM and THLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. THLV is a passively managed fund by THOR that tracks the performance of the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2022. Both SPTM and THLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPTM vs. THLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPTM vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | -3.15% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -1.65% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 6.72% | 10.50% | 9.52% | 5.88% | 2.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 6.72% return.
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 18.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
THLV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 20.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPTM vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPTM vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank
SPTM
THLV
SPTM vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPTM | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.81 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 2.53 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 3.00 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 10.82 | -3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTM | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.81 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.85 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTM and THLV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPTM vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison
SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than THLV's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPTM vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and THLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTM | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.80% | -13.15% | -41.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -6.66% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.36% | -4.46% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -3.75% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 1.85% | +0.70% |
Volatility
SPTM vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.33%. This indicates that SPTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPTM | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.33% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 7.61% | +1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 11.29% | +7.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 11.80% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 11.80% | +6.23% |