PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTM vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTM vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPTM having a 10.61% return and SPYM slightly lower at 10.15%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPTM having a 14.86% annualized return and SPYM not far ahead at 15.15%.


SPTM

1D
0.62%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.78%

SPYM

1D
0.68%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.55%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.15%
ALL TIME*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.04M$39.69M$45.49M
$811.10M$977.30M$1.09B

SPTM vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.61%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.15%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and SPYM is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.87

The correlation between SPTM and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 1.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPTM vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPTM
SPYM

Technology

36.3%
38.5%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.5%

Industrials

8.8%
8.4%

Communication Services

8.7%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Utilities

2.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.7%

Technology

SPTM
36.3%
SPYM
38.5%

Financial Services

SPTM
12.5%
SPYM
11.6%

Healthcare

SPTM
9.3%
SPYM
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPTM
9.1%
SPYM
9.5%

Industrials

SPTM
8.8%
SPYM
8.4%

Communication Services

SPTM
8.7%
SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPTM
4.5%
SPYM
4.5%

Energy

SPTM
3.5%
SPYM
3.0%

Utilities

SPTM
2.6%
SPYM
2.2%

Real Estate

SPTM
2.3%
SPYM
1.8%

Basic Materials

SPTM
2.2%
SPYM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTM vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPTM vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTMSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.21

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

9.43

+0.64

SPTM vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTMSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

-54.46%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.90%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

-18.72%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-24.48%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-33.87%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.41%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-7.11%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.08%

-0.09%

Volatility

SPTM vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 3.50% and 3.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTMSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

3.48%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

10.09%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

12.83%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

16.92%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.01%

+0.02%

SPTM vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPTM vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than SPYM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SPTM and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTM has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to SPYM (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.15% vs 14.86% for SPTM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 1.03% for SPYM.

SPTM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTM and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer