PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SPSM has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 10.87%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.


SPSM

1D
1.63%
1M
0.95%
6M
15.76%
YTD
23.56%
1Y
38.23%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
10.18%

TNA

1D
5.04%
1M
-2.54%
6M
31.47%
YTD
56.19%
1Y
119.05%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
-2.29%
10Y*
6.91%
ALL TIME*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$90.04M$96.96M$95.31M
$289.87M$297.37M$409.17M

SPSM vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
23.56%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
56.19%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and TNA is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013

0.95

The correlation between SPSM and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPSM
TNA

Financial Services

17.1%
17.5%

Industrials

15.6%
14.2%

Technology

15.5%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
9.2%

Healthcare

12.4%
20.3%

Real Estate

7.6%
6.6%

Energy

4.7%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
2.2%

Utilities

1.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

SPSM
17.1%
TNA
17.5%

Industrials

SPSM
15.6%
TNA
14.2%

Technology

SPSM
15.5%
TNA
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPSM
13.2%
TNA
9.2%

Healthcare

SPSM
12.4%
TNA
20.3%

Real Estate

SPSM
7.6%
TNA
6.6%

Energy

SPSM
4.7%
TNA
5.5%

Basic Materials

SPSM
4.7%
TNA
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPSM
4.2%
TNA
2.6%

Communication Services

SPSM
3.2%
TNA
2.2%

Utilities

SPSM
1.8%
TNA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPSM vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSMTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

3.68

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

12.08

+3.02

SPSM vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-88.09%

+45.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-32.53%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-65.78%

+37.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-82.36%

+54.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

-88.09%

+45.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-33.94%

+33.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-33.92%

+26.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

9.89%

-7.35%

Volatility

SPSM vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 3.75%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

12.47%

-8.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

42.13%

-30.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

57.70%

-40.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

67.24%

-45.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

68.38%

-45.43%

SPSM vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPSM vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than TNA's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.37%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.30%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SPSM and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TNA has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to SPSM (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, SPSM leads with 10.87% vs 6.91% for TNA. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.30% for TNA.

SPSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 1.05% for TNA.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer