PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. QQQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 27.27% return.


SPSM

1D
-0.92%
1M
1.62%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.19%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.77%

QQQS

1D
-1.70%
1M
5.91%
YTD
27.27%
6M
27.40%
1Y
79.99%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSM vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
15.28%6.11%8.55%16.11%3.99%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
27.27%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and QQQS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022

0.84

The correlation between SPSM and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPSM
QQQS

Financial Services

16.9%
0.0%

Industrials

15.5%
4.8%

Technology

15.5%
42.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
5.2%

Healthcare

11.0%
41.0%

Real Estate

7.7%

-

Energy

5.9%
2.2%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.0%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
1.4%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Financial Services

SPSM
16.9%
QQQS
0.0%

Industrials

SPSM
15.5%
QQQS
4.8%

Technology

SPSM
15.5%
QQQS
42.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPSM
13.4%
QQQS
5.2%

Healthcare

SPSM
11.0%
QQQS
41.0%

Real Estate

SPSM
7.7%
QQQS

-

Energy

SPSM
5.9%
QQQS
2.2%

Basic Materials

SPSM
5.1%
QQQS
1.0%

Communication Services

SPSM
3.6%
QQQS
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPSM
3.5%
QQQS
1.4%

Utilities

SPSM
2.0%
QQQS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSM vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPSMQQQSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

3.00

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.78

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

5.90

-2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.14

19.70

-7.56

SPSM vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and QQQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPSMQQQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

3.00

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.63

-0.17

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and QQQS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMQQQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-38.06%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-13.63%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-34.32%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-2.55%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-13.26%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

4.07%

-1.47%

Volatility

SPSM vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 4.44%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMQQQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

7.39%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

18.49%

-6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.47%

26.90%

-9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

28.34%

-6.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

28.34%

-5.35%

SPSM vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSM vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than QQQS's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
2.73%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.43%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPSM and QQQS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to SPSM (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs QQQS's -38.06%.

On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 15.89% vs 14.42% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 15.89% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQQS.

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.43% for SPSM.

SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPSM and 0.20% for QQQS.

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and QQQS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer