SPSM vs. ICF
SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPSM returned 11.30%/yr vs 5.99%/yr for ICF. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPSM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ICF.
Performance
SPSM vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than ICF's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SPSM has outperformed ICF with an annualized return of 11.30%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.99% annualized return.
SPSM
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 37.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
ICF
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
SPSM vs. ICF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 19.73% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 26.67% | 11.69% | 25.85% | -11.17% | 15.44% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 16.93% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPSM and ICF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SPSM and ICF shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPSM vs. ICF — Risk / Return Rank
SPSM
ICF
SPSM vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPSM | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 1.82 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 5.18 | +8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPSM vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and ICF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPSM | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -76.74% | +33.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -8.20% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -17.25% | -10.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | -34.74% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.89% | -40.22% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -14.16% | +6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.89% | -0.30% |
Volatility
SPSM vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) at 4.74%. This indicates that SPSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPSM | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 4.74% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 10.33% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 13.94% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 18.95% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 20.60% | +2.40% |
SPSM vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPSM vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than ICF's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.38% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.37% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPSM and ICF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPSM has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to ICF (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs ICF's -76.74%.
On 10-year performance, SPSM leads with 11.30% vs 5.99% for ICF. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.37% for SPSM.
SPSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ICF is REIT. SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.34% for ICF.
SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPSM and ICF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer