PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPSM has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 10.87%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


SPSM

1D
1.63%
1M
0.95%
6M
15.76%
YTD
23.56%
1Y
38.23%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
10.18%

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.78%
YTD
2.10%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
2.24%
ALL TIME*
1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$915.12M$889.94M$918.56M
$90.04M$96.96M$95.31M

SPSM vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
23.56%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.10%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and BIL is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPSM vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSMBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-148.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

68.82

-67.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

346.53

-342.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

2,457.45

-2,442.35

SPSM vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-0.78%

-42.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-0.01%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-0.01%

-27.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-0.08%

-27.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

-0.21%

-42.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-0.26%

-7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.00%

+2.54%

Volatility

SPSM vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that SPSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

0.06%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

0.14%

+11.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

0.20%

+17.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

0.26%

+21.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

0.26%

+22.69%

SPSM vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSM vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than BIL's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.77%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.37%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPSM and BIL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPSM has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, SPSM leads with 10.87% vs 2.24% for BIL. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 1.37% for SPSM.

SPSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.17 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer