SPOT vs. CIBR
SPOT (Spotify Technology S.A.) is a stock, while CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Over the past 5 years, SPOT returned 14.71%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPOT vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOT achieves a -15.22% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.80% return.
SPOT
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- 6M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 1Y
- -29.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.01%
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 27.98%
- YTD
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 24.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.45%
SPOT vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | -15.22% | 29.80% | 138.08% | 138.01% | -66.27% | -25.62% | 110.40% | 31.76% | -31.59% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.80% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | -4.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOT and CIBR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPOT and CIBR has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOT vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
SPOT
CIBR
SPOT vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPOT | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.18 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 1.11 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 2.58 | -3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPOT vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOT drawdown since its inception was -80.51%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOT and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOT | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.51% | -33.89% | -46.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.11% | -21.99% | -22.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.80% | -21.99% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.39% | -33.89% | -42.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.55% | -3.10% | -33.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -8.63% | -22.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.55% | 9.48% | +17.07% |
Volatility
SPOT vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 7.70%. This indicates that SPOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOT | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 7.70% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.30% | 22.49% | +14.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.99% | 25.82% | +19.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.60% | 25.25% | +22.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.21% | 23.62% | +23.59% |
Dividends
SPOT vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
SPOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOT and CIBR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPOT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to CIBR (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPOT dropped -80.51% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPOT and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer