SPMO vs. GAMR
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for GAMR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GAMR.
Performance
SPMO vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than GAMR's -2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed GAMR with an annualized return of 20.86%, while GAMR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
GAMR
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -2.06%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- -1.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
SPMO vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | -2.06% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 14.76% | -18.82% | 59.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and GAMR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2016 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SPMO and GAMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. GAMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
GAMR
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
GAMR
Industrials
SPMO
GAMR
-
Communication Services
SPMO
GAMR
Healthcare
SPMO
GAMR
-
Financial Services
SPMO
GAMR
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
GAMR
-
Energy
SPMO
GAMR
-
Utilities
SPMO
GAMR
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
GAMR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
GAMR
Real Estate
SPMO
GAMR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
GAMR
SPMO vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.10 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 0.39 | +3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 0.88 | +12.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum GAMR drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and GAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -55.37% | +24.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -29.36% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -29.36% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -50.57% | +27.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -55.37% | +24.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -18.39% | +16.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -22.11% | +17.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 12.99% | -9.64% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) at 7.57%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 7.57% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 18.38% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 23.04% | -3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 24.48% | -4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 24.32% | -3.84% |
SPMO vs. GAMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than GAMR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than GAMR's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.53% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and GAMR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to GAMR (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs GAMR's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 12.44% for GAMR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GAMR.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.53% for GAMR.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while GAMR is Gaming. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.59% for GAMR.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and GAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer