PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 8.33%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.


SPLV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.76%
YTD
4.85%
6M
4.17%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
8.33%

VYM

1D
0.08%
1M
3.02%
YTD
12.46%
6M
11.36%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
4.85%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.46%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and VYM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and VYM has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPLV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
VYM

Utilities

24.9%
5.7%

Financial Services

21.3%
20.5%

Real Estate

17.8%
0.0%

Industrials

12.2%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
8.1%

Healthcare

4.0%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
6.7%

Energy

2.7%
9.8%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.5%

Technology

0.8%
17.7%

Communication Services

0.8%
3.5%

Utilities

SPLV
24.9%
VYM
5.7%

Financial Services

SPLV
21.3%
VYM
20.5%

Real Estate

SPLV
17.8%
VYM
0.0%

Industrials

SPLV
12.2%
VYM
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
9.4%
VYM
8.1%

Healthcare

SPLV
4.0%
VYM
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
4.0%
VYM
6.7%

Energy

SPLV
2.7%
VYM
9.8%

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.1%
VYM
3.5%

Technology

SPLV
0.8%
VYM
17.7%

Communication Services

SPLV
0.8%
VYM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPLVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.45

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.91

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

14.57

-13.07

SPLV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-56.98%

+20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-6.69%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-14.46%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-15.84%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-35.21%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-0.44%

-3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-7.18%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

1.79%

+1.36%

Volatility

SPLV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.18%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.18%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

7.78%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

10.43%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

14.00%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

16.35%

-0.97%

SPLV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.15%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and VYM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLV has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to VYM (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.93% vs 8.33% for SPLV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 2.15% for SPLV.

SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while VYM is Dividend. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer