SPIP vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SPIP (SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPIP returned 2.50%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for FNDF. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPIP charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

SPIP vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIP achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIP has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 2.50%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.

SPIP

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: 3.64%
• 5Y*: 0.78%
• 10Y*: 2.50%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 17.34%
• 6M: 20.48%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 12.75%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIP vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF	0.90%	6.78%	2.35%	2.98%	-12.84%	5.80%	11.41%	9.14%	-1.53%	3.16%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	17.34%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIP and FNDF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.03

Over the past year, SPIP and FNDF have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SPIP vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIP

SPIP Risk / Return Rank: 45
SPIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SPIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SPIP Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SPIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SPIP Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIP vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPIP	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.53	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.26	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.45	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	3.71	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	14.05	-7.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPIP vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIP and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPIP	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	2.53	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.79	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.67	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.52	0.00

Drawdowns

SPIP vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPIP	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.39%	-40.14%	+24.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.04%	-10.60%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.76%	-13.89%	+9.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.39%	-25.56%	+10.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.39%	-40.14%	+24.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-3.84%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.10%	-7.64%	+3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	2.80%	-2.10%

Volatility

SPIP vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) is 1.00%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that SPIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPIP	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	5.97%	-4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	13.19%	-10.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56%	15.60%	-12.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.57%	16.28%	-9.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.01%	17.71%	-11.70%

SPIP vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPIP vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than FNDF's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.93%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF	4.78%	4.09%	3.36%	3.70%	7.05%	4.53%	1.97%	2.91%	2.80%	3.02%	1.88%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPIP and FNDF in my portfolio?

SPIP and FNDF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPIP or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SPIP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIP dropped -15.39% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, SPIP or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.78% vs 2.50% for SPIP. On fees, SPIP is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SPIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPIP or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 2.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPIP or FNDF?

SPIP is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPIP or FNDF?

SPIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.93% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between SPIP and FNDF?

SPIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPIP tracks Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPIP and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.