SPIP vs. SCHP
SPIP (SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - SPIP tracks the Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index while SCHP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPIP returned 2.49%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for SCHP. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPIP charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
SPIP vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPIP having a 0.78% return and SCHP slightly higher at 0.81%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPIP having a 2.49% annualized return and SCHP not far ahead at 2.52%.
SPIP
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
SPIP vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF | 0.78% | 6.78% | 2.35% | 2.98% | -12.84% | 5.80% | 11.41% | 9.14% | -1.53% | 3.16% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.81% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIP and SCHP is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SPIP and SCHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPIP vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
SPIP
SCHP
SPIP vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPIP | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.86 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 5.54 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPIP vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIP | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -14.26% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -1.93% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.76% | -4.48% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.39% | -14.26% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.39% | -14.26% | -1.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -1.04% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -3.93% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.65% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SPIP vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) have volatilities of 1.19% and 1.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPIP | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 1.20% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 2.39% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 3.35% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.56% | 6.11% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 5.60% | +0.41% |
SPIP vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPIP vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than SCHP's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.02% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF | 4.79% | 4.09% | 3.36% | 3.70% | 7.05% | 4.53% | 1.97% | 2.91% | 2.80% | 3.02% | 1.88% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SPIP and SCHP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHP has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to SPIP (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIP dropped -15.39% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, SCHP leads with 2.52% vs 2.49% for SPIP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHP has performed better with a 2.52% return vs 2.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SPIP.
SPIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.02% for SCHP.
SPIP tracks Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPIP and 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPIP and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer