SPIP vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
SPIP and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPIP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both SPIP and SCHP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPIP or SCHP.
Key characteristics
| SPIP | SCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.64% | -1.22% |
| 1Y Return | -1.65% | -1.30% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.80% | -1.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.08% | 2.21% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.80% | 1.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.17 | -0.15 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.60% | 5.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.39% | -14.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.33% | -10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIP and SCHP is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPIP vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPIP achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's -1.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPIP having a 1.80% annualized return and SCHP not far ahead at 1.86%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPIP vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPIP vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPIP vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than SCHP's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF | 3.56% | 3.70% | 7.05% | 4.53% | 1.97% | 2.57% | 2.80% | 3.02% | 1.88% | 0.14% | 1.66% | 1.11% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.13% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.63% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.30% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
SPIP vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and SCHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPIP vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) have volatilities of 1.53% and 1.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.