PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIB vs. MIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIB vs. MIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than MIG's 0.39% return.


SPIB

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
2.86%

MIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.39%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIB vs. MIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.46%7.91%4.28%7.27%-9.65%-1.24%0.66%
MIG
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF
0.39%7.34%3.38%8.88%-14.51%-0.02%1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIB and MIG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.93

The correlation between SPIB and MIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIB vs. MIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIB
SPIB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MIG
MIG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIB vs. MIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPIBMIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

1.90

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

5.24

+3.89

SPIB vs. MIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the MIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIB and MIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPIBMIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.27

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.15

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.14

+0.73

Drawdowns

SPIB vs. MIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum MIG drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and MIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIBMIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-20.98%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-2.83%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.18%

-5.61%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.80%

-20.98%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.24%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-6.81%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

1.03%

-0.45%

Volatility

SPIB vs. MIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is 0.93%, while VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that SPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIBMIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

1.47%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

3.13%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

4.26%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

6.35%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

6.22%

-1.62%

SPIB vs. MIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MIG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPIB vs. MIG - Dividend Comparison

SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than MIG's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIG
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF
4.78%4.81%4.68%4.38%3.06%2.15%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.42%4.41%3.84%2.65%1.58%2.18%3.03%3.04%2.79%2.68%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIB and MIG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIG has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to SPIB (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIB dropped -14.94% vs MIG's -20.98%.

On 5-year performance, SPIB leads with 1.79% vs 0.97% for MIG. On fees, SPIB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPIB has performed better with a 1.79% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MIG.

MIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.46% for SPIB.

SPIB tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate, while MIG tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI). They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPIB and 0.20% for MIG.

SPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIB and MIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer