SPHY vs. VOT
SPHY (SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHY returned 5.03%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for VOT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
SPHY vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHY achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHY has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 5.03%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
SPHY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
VOT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SPHY vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 1.32% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 12.81% | -10.57% | 5.61% | 6.65% | 13.16% | -3.35% | 7.35% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 5.49% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHY and VOT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2012 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, SPHY and VOT have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SPHY vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHY
VOT
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPHY
VOT
Energy
SPHY
VOT
Basic Materials
SPHY
-
VOT
Communication Services
SPHY
-
VOT
Consumer Cyclical
SPHY
-
VOT
Consumer Defensive
SPHY
-
VOT
Healthcare
SPHY
-
VOT
Industrials
SPHY
-
VOT
Real Estate
SPHY
-
VOT
Technology
SPHY
-
VOT
Utilities
SPHY
-
VOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHY vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
SPHY
VOT
SPHY vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.09 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 0.49 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 1.46 | +11.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 0.48 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.29 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.57 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.44 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SPHY vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHY drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHY and VOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -60.16% | +38.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -15.96% | +13.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.85% | -21.77% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.29% | -37.19% | +21.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.97% | -37.19% | +15.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -3.48% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -9.96% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 5.33% | -4.80% |
Volatility
SPHY vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) is 1.10%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that SPHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 5.45% | -4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 12.85% | -9.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 16.20% | -12.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 21.41% | -14.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 21.02% | -13.14% |
SPHY vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPHY and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHY vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
SPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than VOT's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.28% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.63% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHY and VOT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to SPHY (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHY dropped -21.97% vs VOT's -60.16%.
On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 11.95% vs 5.03% for SPHY. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, SPHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHY and VOT have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.28%, compared with 0.63% for VOT.
SPHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.
SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHY and VOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer