PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHY vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHY vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHY achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPHY having a 4.86% annualized return and HYG not far behind at 4.64%.


SPHY

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.41%
YTD
2.13%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
4.86%
ALL TIME*
4.96%

HYG

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.13%
YTD
1.81%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
4.64%
ALL TIME*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.88B$2.52B$2.69B
$261.99M$177.04M$128.39M

SPHY vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
2.13%8.59%8.54%12.81%-10.57%5.61%6.65%13.16%-3.35%7.35%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.81%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHY and HYG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2012

0.60

Over the past year, SPHY and HYG have become more correlated (0.97) than their long-term average of 0.60, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHY vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPHY
SPHY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPHY vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHYHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.20

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

9.47

+1.21

SPHY vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHY and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHY vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHY drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHY and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHYHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-34.25%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-2.34%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.85%

-4.56%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.29%

-15.79%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.97%

-22.03%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.22%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-3.22%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.54%

0.00%

Volatility

SPHY vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) have volatilities of 0.79% and 0.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHYHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

0.83%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

3.17%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.87%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.18%

7.53%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

8.21%

-0.38%

SPHY vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHY has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHY vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

SPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than HYG's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
7.23%7.38%7.80%7.30%6.47%5.13%5.63%5.73%4.09%4.41%4.27%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SPHY and HYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HYG has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to SPHY (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHY dropped -21.97% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 10-year performance, SPHY leads with 4.86% vs 4.64% for HYG. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHY has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHY is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 5.91% for HYG.

SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPHY and 0.49% for HYG.

SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHY and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer