PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 15.27%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


SPHQ

1D
1.02%
1M
4.96%
YTD
16.79%
6M
15.77%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
15.27%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
1.35%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.79%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and VGT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005

0.81

The correlation between SPHQ and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPHQ vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
VGT

Technology

33.1%
98.5%

Industrials

20.7%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.7%

-

Financial Services

12.6%
0.5%

Healthcare

8.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
0.1%

Utilities

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.0%

Energy

0.7%
0.3%

Communication Services

0.4%
0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPHQ
33.1%
VGT
98.5%

Industrials

SPHQ
20.7%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
14.7%
VGT

-

Financial Services

SPHQ
12.6%
VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

SPHQ
8.0%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
4.4%
VGT
0.1%

Utilities

SPHQ
3.4%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.0%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

SPHQ
0.7%
VGT
0.3%

Communication Services

SPHQ
0.4%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHQVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.94

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.76

9.11

+2.66

SPHQ vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-54.63%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-16.40%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-27.23%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-35.07%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-35.07%

+3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.18%

+7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-7.95%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

5.28%

-3.19%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 4.92%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

10.00%

-5.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

18.00%

-7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

22.00%

-8.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

25.40%

-8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

24.72%

-6.82%

SPHQ vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.03%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and VGT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to SPHQ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 15.27% for SPHQ. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 15.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while VGT is Technology Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer