PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 15.48% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 15.01%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.


SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and RSP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005

0.87

The correlation between SPHQ and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHQ vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
RSP

Technology

28.1%
19.6%

Industrials

24.3%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
6.5%

Financial Services

13.3%
14.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
9.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.1%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.7%

Utilities

1.0%
6.1%

Energy

0.7%
4.5%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Technology

SPHQ
28.1%
RSP
19.6%

Industrials

SPHQ
24.3%
RSP
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
15.4%
RSP
6.5%

Financial Services

SPHQ
13.3%
RSP
14.5%

Healthcare

SPHQ
8.4%
RSP
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
4.6%
RSP
9.9%

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.2%
RSP
4.1%

Communication Services

SPHQ
2.0%
RSP
3.7%

Utilities

SPHQ
1.0%
RSP
6.1%

Energy

SPHQ
0.7%
RSP
4.5%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

RSP
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQRSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.70

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.47

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.49

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.17

9.48

+1.69

SPHQ vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.70

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.52

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.65

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.57

-0.04

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, roughly equal to the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-59.92%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-7.85%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-17.81%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-21.38%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-39.04%

+7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-6.65%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.06%

+0.02%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

2.56%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

8.29%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

11.56%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

16.18%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

18.35%

-0.49%

SPHQ vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and RSP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 11.86% for RSP. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.20% for RSP.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer