SPHQ vs. CRWV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV).

SPHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005.

Performance

SPHQ vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SPHQ vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.46%	15.16%
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.	9.54%	79.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than CRWV's 9.54% return.

SPHQ

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 12.70%
• 10Y*: 13.63%

CRWV

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: -42.77%
• 1Y: 49.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ

SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CRWV

CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 64
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPHQ	CRWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	0.44	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.45	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.17	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.72	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.35	2.71	+3.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPHQ vs. CRWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the CRWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and CRWV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPHQ	CRWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	0.44	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.80	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and CRWV is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SPHQ vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while CRWV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.18%	1.09%	1.15%	1.42%	1.85%	1.19%	1.55%	1.51%	1.85%	1.57%	1.67%	2.29%
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum CRWV drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and CRWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPHQ	CRWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.83%	-64.84%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.84%	-64.84%	+54.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-57.27%	+51.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-36.68%	+25.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	41.16%	-38.68%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 5.32%, while CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a volatility of 25.10%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPHQ	CRWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	25.10%	-19.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	66.83%	-57.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	119.18%	-102.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.40%	119.20%	-102.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	119.20%	-101.39%