PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHD vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHD vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHD achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHD has underperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 7.17%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.04% annualized return.


SPHD

1D
1.20%
1M
0.01%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.27%
1Y
10.27%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
7.17%

LVHD

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.40%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHD vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
5.63%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
7.25%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHD and LVHD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2015

0.91

The correlation between SPHD and LVHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHD vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHD
LVHD

Real Estate

20.1%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

17.8%
18.5%

Financial Services

15.6%
8.6%

Energy

14.1%
6.7%

Utilities

13.7%
25.5%

Communication Services

8.6%
3.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
6.8%

Technology

1.5%
5.9%

Industrials

0.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

SPHD
20.1%
LVHD
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPHD
17.8%
LVHD
18.5%

Financial Services

SPHD
15.6%
LVHD
8.6%

Energy

SPHD
14.1%
LVHD
6.7%

Utilities

SPHD
13.7%
LVHD
25.5%

Communication Services

SPHD
8.6%
LVHD
3.8%

Healthcare

SPHD
5.1%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHD
3.4%
LVHD
6.8%

Technology

SPHD
1.5%
LVHD
5.9%

Industrials

SPHD
0.0%
LVHD
4.6%

Basic Materials

SPHD

-

LVHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHD vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHD vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHDLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.77

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

4.49

-0.98

SPHD vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHD and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHDLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.15

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.52

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.57

+0.02

Drawdowns

SPHD vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.39%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHD and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHDLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.39%

-37.32%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-6.17%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-14.29%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-16.75%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

-37.32%

-4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-4.37%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-4.05%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.43%

+0.51%

Volatility

SPHD vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.89%. This indicates that SPHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHDLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

2.89%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

6.61%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

9.53%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

12.87%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

15.50%

+2.14%

SPHD vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHD vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than LVHD's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.39%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.57%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SPHD and LVHD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPHD has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to LVHD (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHD dropped -41.39% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, LVHD leads with 8.04% vs 7.17% for SPHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 8.04% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 3.39% for LVHD.

SPHD is categorized as Dividend, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPHD and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHD and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer