PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. FFHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.93%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
-0.54%6.02%8.49%13.19%-1.55%5.66%2.54%9.42%1.36%4.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than FFHCX's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has outperformed FFHCX with an annualized return of 8.20%, while FFHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
0.34%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
6.93%
6M
4.97%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
8.20%

FFHCX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.54%
6M
0.95%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LVHD vs. FFHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FFHCX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. FFHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FFHCX
FFHCX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FFHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FFHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHDFFHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.65

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

2.45

-1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.58

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.04

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.64

10.03

-6.38

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the FFHCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and FFHCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHDFFHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.65

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.92

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

1.40

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.36

-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and FFHCX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FFHCX's 7.31% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.19%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.31%8.11%8.46%9.47%3.83%3.64%4.61%5.92%6.68%4.80%5.16%4.37%

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than FFHCX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and FFHCX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDFFHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-21.45%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-2.71%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-5.81%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-21.45%

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-0.73%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-0.94%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

0.55%

+1.92%

Volatility

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Volatility Comparison

Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX) at 0.68%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LVHDFFHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

0.68%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

1.85%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

3.45%

+8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

3.06%

+9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

4.15%

+11.35%