PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. FFHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than FFHCX's 2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has outperformed FFHCX with an annualized return of 8.26%, while FFHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.57% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.55%
6M
7.65%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
8.26%
ALL TIME*
9.16%

FFHCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.24M$2.50M$2.89M

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.58%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.37%6.02%8.49%13.19%-1.55%5.66%2.54%9.42%1.36%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and FFHCX is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.20

The correlation between LVHD and FFHCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. FFHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FFHCX
FFHCX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FFHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FFHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDFFHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.80

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

5.21

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

17.59

-11.63

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the FFHCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and FFHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than FFHCX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and FFHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDFFHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-21.45%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-1.14%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

-3.12%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-5.81%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-21.45%

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-0.11%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-0.92%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

0.34%

+2.15%

Volatility

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX) at 0.33%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDFFHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

0.33%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

1.90%

+6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

2.60%

+7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

3.11%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

4.17%

+11.40%

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FFHCX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LVHD vs. FFHCX - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FFHCX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
6.91%8.11%8.46%9.47%3.83%3.64%4.61%5.92%6.68%4.80%5.16%4.37%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.20%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and FFHCX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to FFHCX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs FFHCX's -21.45%.

FFHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and FFHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer