SPHB vs. VFMV
SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. SPHB is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPHB returned 15.78%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for VFMV. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
SPHB vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 9.62% return.
SPHB
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 1Y
- 44.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHB vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 24.96% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -16.73% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.62% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHB and VFMV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SPHB and VFMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHB vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHB
VFMV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHB
VFMV
Financial Services
SPHB
VFMV
Industrials
SPHB
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
SPHB
VFMV
Healthcare
SPHB
VFMV
Utilities
SPHB
VFMV
Basic Materials
SPHB
VFMV
-
Communication Services
SPHB
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
SPHB
VFMV
Energy
SPHB
VFMV
Real Estate
SPHB
-
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHB vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
SPHB
VFMV
SPHB vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHB | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 2.26 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 8.67 | +6.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHB vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHB | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -33.64% | -13.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -6.00% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.21% | -10.35% | -18.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -15.41% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -0.03% | -7.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -3.61% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.56% | +1.47% |
Volatility
SPHB vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHB | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 2.09% | +9.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.68% | 6.32% | +14.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.22% | 8.76% | +16.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 11.74% | +16.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.50% | 14.18% | +14.32% |
SPHB vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHB vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than VFMV's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.56% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.77% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHB and VFMV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, SPHB leads with 15.78% vs 9.41% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.56% for SPHB.
SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.13% for VFMV.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHB and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer