PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 30.36% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 8.53% return.


SPHB

1D
-0.67%
1M
12.37%
YTD
30.36%
6M
31.36%
1Y
69.40%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
18.92%

VFMV

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.30%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.37%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHB vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
30.36%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-17.11%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
8.53%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and VFMV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.65

The correlation between SPHB and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHB vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
VFMV

Technology

45.8%
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
6.9%

Financial Services

12.5%
10.6%

Industrials

11.7%
10.1%

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Communication Services

3.7%
10.7%

Utilities

3.2%
6.7%

Healthcare

2.9%
10.1%

Energy

2.2%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
9.5%

Real Estate

-

6.4%

Technology

SPHB
45.8%
VFMV
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
12.9%
VFMV
6.9%

Financial Services

SPHB
12.5%
VFMV
10.6%

Industrials

SPHB
11.7%
VFMV
10.1%

Basic Materials

SPHB
4.6%
VFMV

-

Communication Services

SPHB
3.7%
VFMV
10.7%

Utilities

SPHB
3.2%
VFMV
6.7%

Healthcare

SPHB
2.9%
VFMV
10.1%

Energy

SPHB
2.2%
VFMV
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.6%
VFMV
9.5%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

VFMV
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHB vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHBVFMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.26

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

2.18

+4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.92

8.57

+17.35

SPHB vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHBVFMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

1.49

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.84

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.69

-0.17

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and VFMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-33.64%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-6.00%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-10.35%

-18.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-15.41%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-1.02%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-3.64%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.53%

+1.16%

Volatility

SPHB vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

2.09%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

6.30%

+10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

8.80%

+13.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.38%

11.75%

+15.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.45%

14.25%

+14.20%

SPHB vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHB vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.52%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.93%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and VFMV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

On 5-year performance, SPHB leads with 15.19% vs 9.82% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 15.19% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.52% for SPHB.

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.13% for VFMV.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and VFMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer