SPHB vs. SPYM
SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPHB tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index while SPYM tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHB returned 18.26%/yr vs 15.18%/yr for SPYM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
SPHB vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 18.26%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.18% annualized return.
SPHB
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 1Y
- 44.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
SPHB vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 24.96% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 17.87% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 10.50% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHB and SPYM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SPHB and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPHB vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHB
SPYM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHB
SPYM
Financial Services
SPHB
SPYM
Industrials
SPHB
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
SPHB
SPYM
Healthcare
SPHB
SPYM
Utilities
SPHB
SPYM
Basic Materials
SPHB
SPYM
Communication Services
SPHB
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
SPHB
SPYM
Energy
SPHB
SPYM
Real Estate
SPHB
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHB vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
SPHB
SPYM
SPHB vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHB | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 2.43 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 10.62 | +4.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHB vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHB | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -54.46% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -8.90% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.21% | -18.72% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -24.48% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | -33.87% | -12.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -1.09% | -5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -7.13% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.04% | +0.99% |
Volatility
SPHB vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.22%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHB | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 4.22% | +7.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.68% | 9.99% | +10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.22% | 12.55% | +12.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 16.92% | +10.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.50% | 18.00% | +10.50% |
SPHB vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHB vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SPYM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.56% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHB and SPYM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to SPYM (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 18.26% vs 15.18% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 15.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.56% for SPHB.
SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHB and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer