PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 30.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 18.92%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.62% annualized return.


SPHB

1D
-0.67%
1M
12.37%
YTD
30.36%
6M
31.36%
1Y
69.40%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
18.92%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHB vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
30.36%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and SPYM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011

0.81

The correlation between SPHB and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHB vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
SPYM

Technology

45.8%
38.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
9.9%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.1%

Industrials

11.7%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
10.6%

Utilities

3.2%
2.5%

Healthcare

2.9%
8.4%

Energy

2.2%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
4.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

SPHB
45.8%
SPYM
38.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
12.9%
SPYM
9.9%

Financial Services

SPHB
12.5%
SPYM
11.1%

Industrials

SPHB
11.7%
SPYM
7.6%

Basic Materials

SPHB
4.6%
SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

SPHB
3.7%
SPYM
10.6%

Utilities

SPHB
3.2%
SPYM
2.5%

Healthcare

SPHB
2.9%
SPYM
8.4%

Energy

SPHB
2.2%
SPYM
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.6%
SPYM
4.6%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

SPYM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHB vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHBSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.44

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

3.17

+3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.92

14.76

+11.17

SPHB vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHBSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.39

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.83

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.87

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.62

-0.09

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-54.46%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-8.90%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-18.72%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-24.48%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-33.87%

-12.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.66%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-7.15%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.91%

+0.78%

Volatility

SPHB vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

2.83%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

8.90%

+8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

11.80%

+10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.38%

16.80%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.45%

18.00%

+10.45%

SPHB vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHB vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.52%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and SPYM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 18.92% vs 15.62% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.52% for SPHB.

SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer