PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. RSPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 35.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed RSPG with an annualized return of 17.94%, while RSPG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.


SPHB

1D
0.05%
1M
-5.41%
6M
15.81%
YTD
19.95%
1Y
39.56%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
17.94%
ALL TIME*
13.56%

RSPG

1D
1.45%
1M
9.65%
6M
20.75%
YTD
35.64%
1Y
46.87%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
24.85%
10Y*
9.99%
ALL TIME*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.49M$8.09M$10.58M
$46.45M$55.30M$54.87M

SPHB vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
19.95%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
35.64%7.01%6.09%4.49%57.97%57.73%-32.44%13.38%-24.68%-6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and RSPG is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.64

The correlation between SPHB and RSPG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPHB vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
RSPG

Technology

45.0%

-

Financial Services

14.9%
0.0%

Industrials

13.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%

-

Healthcare

5.9%

-

Utilities

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

2.3%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Energy

0.8%
100.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPHB
45.0%
RSPG

-

Financial Services

SPHB
14.9%
RSPG
0.0%

Industrials

SPHB
13.0%
RSPG

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
10.6%
RSPG

-

Healthcare

SPHB
5.9%
RSPG

-

Utilities

SPHB
3.5%
RSPG

-

Basic Materials

SPHB
2.3%
RSPG

-

Communication Services

SPHB
1.6%
RSPG

-

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.9%
RSPG

-

Energy

SPHB
0.8%
RSPG
100.0%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

RSPG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPG
RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPHB vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHBRSPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.18

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

8.07

+1.79

SPHB vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the RSPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and RSPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and RSPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBRSPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-79.98%

+33.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-13.72%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-23.06%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-28.44%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-73.17%

+26.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.79%

-4.71%

-6.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-25.33%

+16.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

5.43%

-1.67%

Volatility

SPHB vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) at 6.13%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBRSPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.30%

6.13%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

16.97%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.09%

22.06%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

27.93%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

33.44%

-4.87%

SPHB vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHB vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than RSPG's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
1.96%2.60%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.58%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and RSPG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to RSPG (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs RSPG's -79.98%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 17.94% vs 9.99% for RSPG. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RSPG has been the lower-risk option at 6.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.58% for SPHB.

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.40% for RSPG.

RSPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and RSPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer