SPHB vs. MTUM
SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHB returned 18.26%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for MTUM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
SPHB vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPHB having a 24.96% return and MTUM slightly higher at 25.95%. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 18.26%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively lower 16.34% annualized return.
SPHB
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 1Y
- 44.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
MTUM
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 21.75%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 1Y
- 34.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.38%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
SPHB vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 24.96% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 17.87% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 25.95% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHB and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SPHB and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (10 years) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHB vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHB
MTUM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHB
MTUM
Financial Services
SPHB
MTUM
Industrials
SPHB
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
SPHB
MTUM
Healthcare
SPHB
MTUM
Utilities
SPHB
MTUM
Basic Materials
SPHB
MTUM
Communication Services
SPHB
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
SPHB
MTUM
Energy
SPHB
MTUM
Real Estate
SPHB
-
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHB vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
SPHB
MTUM
SPHB vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHB | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 2.97 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 10.23 | +4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHB vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHB | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -34.08% | -12.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -11.54% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.21% | -20.99% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -32.28% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | -34.08% | -12.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -8.86% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -6.19% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.34% | -0.31% |
Volatility
SPHB vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) is 11.33%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that SPHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHB | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 13.18% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.68% | 21.54% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.22% | 23.81% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 21.54% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.50% | 21.52% | +6.98% |
SPHB vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHB vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than MTUM's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.59% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.56% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHB and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to SPHB (11.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 18.26% vs 16.34% for MTUM. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHB has been the lower-risk option at 11.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 16.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.56% for SPHB.
SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while MTUM is Momentum. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.15% for MTUM.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHB and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer