PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGP vs. SPHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGP vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 30.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP has underperformed SPHB with an annualized return of 14.80%, while SPHB has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.


SPGP

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.65%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
14.80%

SPHB

1D
-0.67%
1M
12.37%
YTD
30.36%
6M
31.36%
1Y
69.40%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
6.12%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
30.36%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and SPHB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.78

The correlation between SPGP and SPHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPGP vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGP
SPHB

Technology

22.8%
45.8%

Financial Services

22.2%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.0%
12.9%

Industrials

16.8%
11.7%

Energy

7.1%
2.2%

Communication Services

6.6%
3.7%

Healthcare

3.8%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Technology

SPGP
22.8%
SPHB
45.8%

Financial Services

SPGP
22.2%
SPHB
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP
18.0%
SPHB
12.9%

Industrials

SPGP
16.8%
SPHB
11.7%

Energy

SPGP
7.1%
SPHB
2.2%

Communication Services

SPGP
6.6%
SPHB
3.7%

Healthcare

SPGP
3.8%
SPHB
2.9%

Real Estate

SPGP
2.7%
SPHB

-

Basic Materials

SPGP

-

SPHB
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPGP

-

SPHB
0.6%

Utilities

SPGP

-

SPHB
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGP vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGPSPHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.50

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

6.52

-4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

25.92

-19.98

SPGP vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGPSPHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

3.16

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.56

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.67

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.53

+0.21

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and SPHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGPSPHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-46.84%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-10.70%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-29.21%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-31.49%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

-46.84%

+4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.67%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-8.50%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.69%

+0.21%

Volatility

SPGP vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is 3.74%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that SPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGPSPHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

7.14%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

16.99%

-5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

22.16%

-7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

27.38%

-8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

28.45%

-7.25%

SPGP vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGP vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SPHB's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.88%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.52%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGP and SPHB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 18.92% vs 14.80% for SPGP. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.52% for SPHB.

SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.25% for SPHB.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP and SPHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer