PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGP vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGP vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 15.12%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.


SPGP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.78%
6M
9.37%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
15.12%
ALL TIME*
14.46%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M
$11.85M$11.53M$9.19M

SPGP vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
10.71%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and SCHD is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between SPGP and SCHD has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPGP vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGP
SCHD

Financial Services

30.5%
9.9%

Technology

22.6%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
7.7%

Industrials

10.0%
7.8%

Healthcare

9.8%
20.8%

Communication Services

6.7%
6.2%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Utilities

2.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.2%

Energy

1.2%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
20.6%

Financial Services

SPGP
30.5%
SCHD
9.9%

Technology

SPGP
22.6%
SCHD
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP
12.8%
SCHD
7.7%

Industrials

SPGP
10.0%
SCHD
7.8%

Healthcare

SPGP
9.8%
SCHD
20.8%

Communication Services

SPGP
6.7%
SCHD
6.2%

Real Estate

SPGP
2.9%
SCHD

-

Utilities

SPGP
2.7%
SCHD
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPGP
1.6%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

SPGP
1.2%
SCHD
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPGP
1.0%
SCHD
20.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGP vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPGP vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPGPSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.51

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

6.74

-5.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.55

17.01

-11.47

SPGP vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGPSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-33.37%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-4.61%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-16.13%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-16.85%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

-33.37%

-8.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.24%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-3.30%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.82%

+1.09%

Volatility

SPGP vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is 3.74%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that SPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGPSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.11%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

8.11%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

11.13%

+4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.64%

14.39%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

16.72%

+4.49%

SPGP vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGP vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.80%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGP and SCHD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SPGP leads with 15.12% vs 12.76% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGP has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.80% for SPGP.

SPGP is categorized as Multi-factor, while SCHD is Dividend. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer