SPGP vs. GARP
SPGP (Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 GARP Index, while GARP is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPGP returned 8.08%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for GARP. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPGP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
SPGP vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.89% return.
SPGP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.46%
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $11.85M | $11.53M | $9.19M |
SPGP vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 10.71% | 9.80% | 8.48% | 20.29% | -13.83% | 35.72% | 14.54% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGP and GARP is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SPGP and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPGP vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGP
GARP
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
SPGP
GARP
Technology
SPGP
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
SPGP
GARP
Industrials
SPGP
GARP
Healthcare
SPGP
GARP
Communication Services
SPGP
GARP
Real Estate
SPGP
GARP
Utilities
SPGP
GARP
Basic Materials
SPGP
GARP
Energy
SPGP
GARP
Consumer Defensive
SPGP
GARP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGP vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
SPGP
GARP
SPGP vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPGP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.19 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 7.99 | -2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPGP vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -31.34% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.15% | -13.69% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -23.73% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -30.61% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -4.34% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -7.27% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.75% | -0.84% |
Volatility
SPGP vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is 3.74%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that SPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 5.68% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 16.18% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 20.02% | -4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 22.34% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 23.92% | -2.71% |
SPGP vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGP vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 0.80% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.24% | 1.22% | 0.69% | 1.10% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.89% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGP and GARP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 8.08% for SPGP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.
SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
SPGP is categorized as Multi-factor, while GARP is Quality Factor. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGP and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer