SPGM vs. HERD
SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI while HERD tracks the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPGM returned 11.48%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for HERD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPGM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
SPGM vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than HERD's 12.05% return.
SPGM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 12.88% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -17.53% | 21.13% | 15.28% | 11.67% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGM and HERD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SPGM and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPGM vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGM
HERD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPGM
HERD
Financial Services
SPGM
HERD
Industrials
SPGM
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
SPGM
HERD
Communication Services
SPGM
HERD
Healthcare
SPGM
HERD
Consumer Defensive
SPGM
HERD
Energy
SPGM
HERD
Basic Materials
SPGM
HERD
Utilities
SPGM
HERD
Real Estate
SPGM
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGM vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
SPGM
HERD
SPGM vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPGM | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 5.19 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 17.73 | -2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPGM | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.54 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.63 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SPGM vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGM | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -39.41% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -5.68% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -18.90% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -21.60% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.67% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -4.55% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.66% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SPGM vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 2.92%. This indicates that SPGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGM | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 2.92% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 7.74% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 11.62% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 17.76% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 20.50% | -2.93% |
SPGM vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGM vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGM and HERD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPGM has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 5-year performance, SPGM leads with 11.48% vs 9.95% for HERD. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.
SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.73% for HERD.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGM and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer