PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGM vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGM vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGM has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 13.05%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.


SPGM

1D
0.46%
1M
5.38%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.08%
1Y
33.29%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
13.05%

VXUS

1D
0.75%
1M
4.81%
YTD
15.39%
6M
18.56%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
13.86%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
15.39%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and VXUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012

0.78

The correlation between SPGM and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGM vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGM
VXUS

Technology

27.4%
18.1%

Financial Services

16.4%
22.3%

Industrials

13.1%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.4%

Communication Services

8.5%
4.4%

Healthcare

8.2%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.0%

Energy

4.5%
5.2%

Basic Materials

3.9%
7.6%

Utilities

2.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.6%

Technology

SPGM
27.4%
VXUS
18.1%

Financial Services

SPGM
16.4%
VXUS
22.3%

Industrials

SPGM
13.1%
VXUS
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGM
9.2%
VXUS
8.4%

Communication Services

SPGM
8.5%
VXUS
4.4%

Healthcare

SPGM
8.2%
VXUS
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPGM
4.8%
VXUS
5.0%

Energy

SPGM
4.5%
VXUS
5.2%

Basic Materials

SPGM
3.9%
VXUS
7.6%

Utilities

SPGM
2.2%
VXUS
3.2%

Real Estate

SPGM
1.9%
VXUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGM vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGMVXUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

2.16

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

2.96

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

3.02

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.27

11.82

+4.45

SPGM vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGMVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.16

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.56

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.58

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.39

+0.27

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGMVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-35.97%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-11.27%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-13.58%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-29.44%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-35.97%

+2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-8.22%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.88%

-0.78%

Volatility

SPGM vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 3.82%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGMVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

5.57%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.31%

12.97%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

15.19%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

16.04%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

17.16%

+0.42%

SPGM vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPGM vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than VXUS's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.78%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.63%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SPGM and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to SPGM (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 13.05% vs 9.86% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 9.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPGM.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.78% for SPGM.

SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.05% for VXUS.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGM and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer