PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.23%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


SPGM

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
10.79%
6M
9.88%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.23%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
10.79%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and VOO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012

0.79

The correlation between SPGM and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGM
VOO

Technology

30.7%
39.1%

Financial Services

15.7%
10.9%

Industrials

12.5%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.8%

Communication Services

8.2%
10.5%

Healthcare

7.9%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.5%

Energy

4.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

3.8%
1.7%

Utilities

2.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SPGM
30.7%
VOO
39.1%

Financial Services

SPGM
15.7%
VOO
10.9%

Industrials

SPGM
12.5%
VOO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGM
9.0%
VOO
9.8%

Communication Services

SPGM
8.2%
VOO
10.5%

Healthcare

SPGM
7.9%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPGM
4.5%
VOO
4.5%

Energy

SPGM
4.0%
VOO
3.2%

Basic Materials

SPGM
3.8%
VOO
1.7%

Utilities

SPGM
2.0%
VOO
2.5%

Real Estate

SPGM
1.8%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPGMVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.67

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

11.96

+1.22

SPGM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-33.99%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-8.90%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-18.69%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-24.52%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-33.99%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-3.14%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-3.68%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.99%

+0.17%

Volatility

SPGM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that SPGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

4.83%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

9.82%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

12.46%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

16.91%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

18.02%

-0.52%

SPGM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPGM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.83%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SPGM and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPGM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 13.23% for SPGM. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPGM.

SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

SPGM is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.03% for VOO.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer