PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGM vs. HAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGM vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly lower than HAIL's 31.10% return.


SPGM

1D
-0.87%
1M
4.94%
YTD
12.88%
6M
13.62%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
12.95%

HAIL

1D
-2.34%
1M
16.87%
YTD
31.10%
6M
29.05%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
-5.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
12.88%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%0.48%
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
31.10%19.62%-6.98%9.65%-45.72%1.95%84.33%30.63%-19.96%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and HAIL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.77

The correlation between SPGM and HAIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPGM vs. HAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGM
HAIL

Technology

27.4%
33.1%

Financial Services

16.4%
1.9%

Industrials

13.1%
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
34.2%

Communication Services

8.5%
4.9%

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

4.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.2%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Technology

SPGM
27.4%
HAIL
33.1%

Financial Services

SPGM
16.4%
HAIL
1.9%

Industrials

SPGM
13.1%
HAIL
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGM
9.2%
HAIL
34.2%

Communication Services

SPGM
8.5%
HAIL
4.9%

Healthcare

SPGM
8.2%
HAIL

-

Consumer Defensive

SPGM
4.8%
HAIL

-

Energy

SPGM
4.5%
HAIL
4.4%

Basic Materials

SPGM
3.9%
HAIL
1.2%

Utilities

SPGM
2.2%
HAIL

-

Real Estate

SPGM
1.9%
HAIL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGM vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

HAIL
HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGMHAILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.00

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

2.64

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.14

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.14

9.49

+5.65

SPGM vs. HAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the HAIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and HAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGMHAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.00

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

-0.17

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.20

+0.45

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and HAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGMHAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-65.98%

+32.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-18.64%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-40.96%

+24.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-63.12%

+37.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-30.85%

+29.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-31.60%

+26.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

6.15%

-4.05%

Volatility

SPGM vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 3.92%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGMHAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

10.80%

-6.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

22.28%

-11.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

29.32%

-16.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

31.80%

-15.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

31.73%

-14.16%

SPGM vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGM vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than HAIL's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
1.44%2.00%2.98%2.62%2.09%1.36%0.52%1.17%2.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.79%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGM and HAIL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAIL has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to SPGM (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs HAIL's -65.98%.

On 5-year performance, SPGM leads with 11.48% vs -5.36% for HAIL. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HAIL.

SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.44% for HAIL.

SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI, while HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.45% for HAIL.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGM and HAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer