PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAIL vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HAIL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAIL achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return.


HAIL

1D
-3.39%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
16.75%
6M
13.47%
1Y
36.55%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
-7.00%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAIL vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
16.75%19.62%-6.98%9.65%-45.72%1.95%84.33%30.63%-19.96%-0.65%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HAIL and ^GSPC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.74

The correlation between HAIL and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAIL vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAIL
HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAIL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAIL^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.46

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.59

10.92

-5.33

HAIL vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAIL and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAIL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAIL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIL and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAIL^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-56.78%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.64%

-9.10%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.96%

-18.90%

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.01%

-25.43%

-37.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.42%

-3.21%

-35.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.61%

-10.71%

-20.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

2.04%

+4.52%

Volatility

HAIL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that HAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAIL^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.59%

4.89%

+8.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.74%

9.93%

+14.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.90%

12.57%

+18.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

17.00%

+15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.87%

18.08%

+13.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAIL and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAIL has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAIL dropped -65.98% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAIL and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer