HAIL vs. MOTO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) and MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAIL is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, while MOTO is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. HAIL is passively managed, while MOTO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAIL returned -6.30%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for MOTO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAIL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MOTO.

Performance

HAIL vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAIL achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly lower than MOTO's 27.74% return.

HAIL

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 20.85%
• 6M: 16.53%
• 1Y: 43.03%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: -6.30%
• 10Y*: —

MOTO

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 27.74%
• 6M: 27.33%
• 1Y: 52.58%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAIL vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF	20.85%	19.62%	-6.98%	9.65%	-45.72%	1.95%	84.33%	5.96%
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	27.74%	27.38%	2.01%	27.10%	-27.20%	17.22%	59.13%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HAIL and MOTO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019	0.84

The correlation between HAIL and MOTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAIL vs. MOTO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAIL	MOTO
Technology	39.4%	45.1%
Consumer Cyclical	32.6%	26.4%
Industrials	21.0%	18.7%
Communication Services	4.8%	4.1%
Financial Services	3.1%	1.0%
Basic Materials	1.2%	3.6%
Energy	1.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	2.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

HAIL vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAIL

HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 42
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 42

MOTO

MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 73
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAIL vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAIL	MOTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.35	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	3.00	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.40	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.96	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	13.58	-6.94

HAIL vs. MOTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the MOTO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAIL and MOTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAIL vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAIL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than MOTO's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIL and MOTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAIL	MOTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.98%	-38.24%	-27.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.64%	-13.36%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.96%	-26.43%	-14.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.01%	-37.34%	-25.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.25%	-2.87%	-33.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.61%	-9.93%	-21.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.51%	3.88%	+2.63%

Volatility

HAIL vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a higher volatility of 13.43% compared to SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) at 10.12%. This indicates that HAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAIL	MOTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.43%	10.12%	+3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.53%	18.43%	+6.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.76%	22.55%	+8.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.14%	23.89%	+8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.85%	26.40%	+5.45%

HAIL vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTO's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAIL vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison

HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than MOTO's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF	1.82%	2.00%	2.98%	2.62%	2.09%	1.36%	0.52%	1.17%	2.54%
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	0.83%	1.06%	1.07%	2.73%	2.33%	0.55%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAIL and MOTO in my portfolio?

HAIL and MOTO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAIL or MOTO?

HAIL has higher volatility (13.43%) compared to MOTO (10.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAIL dropped -65.98% vs MOTO's -38.24%.

Which ETF is better, HAIL or MOTO?

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 10.34% vs -6.30% for HAIL. On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 10.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAIL or MOTO?

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 10.34% return vs -6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAIL or MOTO?

HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAIL or MOTO?

HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.83% for MOTO.

What is the main difference between HAIL and MOTO?

HAIL is categorized as Global Equities, while MOTO is Transportation Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HAIL and 0.68% for MOTO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.