PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEU vs. EFNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEU vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEU achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly higher than EFNL's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEU has outperformed EFNL with an annualized return of 9.87%, while EFNL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.71% annualized return.


SPEU

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.14%
6M
5.09%
YTD
9.83%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
9.87%
ALL TIME*
7.02%

EFNL

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.57%
6M
6.20%
YTD
9.24%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
8.71%
ALL TIME*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$520.43K$2.79M$3.90M
$1.27M$1.33M$1.75M

SPEU vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEU
SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF
9.83%35.80%1.93%19.85%-15.97%16.20%6.35%26.15%-13.79%23.80%
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
9.24%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEU and EFNL is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012

0.77

The correlation between SPEU and EFNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPEU vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEU
EFNL

Financial Services

23.7%
28.6%

Industrials

20.2%
21.0%

Healthcare

12.6%
4.4%

Technology

9.8%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

5.3%
9.7%

Energy

4.6%
5.0%

Utilities

4.5%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.8%

Financial Services

SPEU
23.7%
EFNL
28.6%

Industrials

SPEU
20.2%
EFNL
21.0%

Healthcare

SPEU
12.6%
EFNL
4.4%

Technology

SPEU
9.8%
EFNL
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPEU
8.0%
EFNL
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEU
7.1%
EFNL
4.4%

Basic Materials

SPEU
5.3%
EFNL
9.7%

Energy

SPEU
4.6%
EFNL
5.0%

Utilities

SPEU
4.5%
EFNL
3.8%

Communication Services

SPEU
2.8%
EFNL
2.3%

Real Estate

SPEU
1.5%
EFNL
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEU vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPEU
SPEU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPEU vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEUEFNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.52

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

7.34

-0.21

SPEU vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEU and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEU vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEU drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than EFNL's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEU and EFNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEUEFNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-38.70%

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-12.17%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-15.78%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

-38.70%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.83%

-38.70%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-10.24%

+9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-10.90%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

4.17%

-0.95%

Volatility

SPEU vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) is 4.38%, while iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that SPEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEUEFNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

5.85%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

16.37%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

19.28%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

20.00%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

19.90%

-1.75%

SPEU vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEU has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPEU vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

SPEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than EFNL's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
1.04%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
SPEU
SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF
3.37%3.47%3.29%2.91%3.08%2.67%2.29%3.19%3.99%2.82%3.66%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEU and EFNL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFNL has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to SPEU (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEU dropped -62.45% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

On 10-year performance, SPEU leads with 9.87% vs 8.71% for EFNL. On fees, SPEU is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPEU has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEU is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EFNL.

SPEU has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.04% for EFNL.

SPEU tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Index, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPEU and 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEU and EFNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer