PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEU vs. GMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEU vs. GMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEU achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than GMF's 12.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPEU having a 10.12% annualized return and GMF not far ahead at 10.35%.


SPEU

1D
-1.28%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
5.69%
6M
5.86%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
10.12%

GMF

1D
-3.49%
1M
2.67%
YTD
12.22%
6M
12.01%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEU vs. GMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEU
SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF
5.69%35.80%1.93%19.85%-15.97%16.20%6.35%26.15%-13.79%23.80%
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
12.22%21.99%16.55%8.20%-18.99%-1.93%24.96%19.92%-14.25%41.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEU and GMF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.70

The correlation between SPEU and GMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEU vs. GMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEU
GMF

Financial Services

23.1%
15.4%

Industrials

20.0%
7.3%

Healthcare

11.2%
4.5%

Technology

10.1%
40.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
10.7%

Basic Materials

6.0%
5.8%

Energy

5.5%
3.1%

Utilities

4.8%
2.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
6.4%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Financial Services

SPEU
23.1%
GMF
15.4%

Industrials

SPEU
20.0%
GMF
7.3%

Healthcare

SPEU
11.2%
GMF
4.5%

Technology

SPEU
10.1%
GMF
40.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPEU
7.7%
GMF
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEU
6.5%
GMF
10.7%

Basic Materials

SPEU
6.0%
GMF
5.8%

Energy

SPEU
5.5%
GMF
3.1%

Utilities

SPEU
4.8%
GMF
2.0%

Communication Services

SPEU
3.4%
GMF
6.4%

Real Estate

SPEU
1.7%
GMF
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEU vs. GMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEU
SPEU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GMF
GMF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEU vs. GMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEUGMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.27

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

8.24

-2.56

SPEU vs. GMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the GMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEU and GMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEU vs. GMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEU drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, smaller than the maximum GMF drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEU and GMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEUGMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-67.18%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-12.62%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-21.43%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

-35.76%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.83%

-40.18%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-3.49%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-16.55%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.47%

-0.17%

Volatility

SPEU vs. GMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) is 4.97%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that SPEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEUGMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

8.35%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

15.32%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

17.78%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

18.79%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

19.22%

-1.03%

SPEU vs. GMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEU has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GMF's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPEU vs. GMF - Dividend Comparison

SPEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than GMF's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
1.20%1.49%1.92%2.75%2.54%2.71%1.32%1.75%2.26%1.70%2.49%3.76%
SPEU
SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF
3.50%3.47%3.29%2.91%3.08%2.67%2.29%3.19%3.99%2.82%3.66%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEU and GMF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMF has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to SPEU (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEU dropped -62.45% vs GMF's -67.18%.

On 10-year performance, GMF leads with 10.35% vs 10.12% for SPEU. On fees, SPEU is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GMF has performed better with a 10.35% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEU is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GMF.

SPEU has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 1.20% for GMF.

SPEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while GMF is Asia Pacific Equities. SPEU tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Index, while GMF tracks S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPEU and 0.49% for GMF.

GMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEU and GMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer