PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEM vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEM vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 9.63%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.


SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%

SPYV

1D
0.69%
1M
1.59%
YTD
8.25%
6M
8.02%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEM vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
8.25%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEM and SPYV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.68

The correlation between SPEM and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPEM vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEM
SPYV

Technology

28.2%
21.5%

Financial Services

20.2%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
11.2%

Industrials

8.5%
10.8%

Basic Materials

8.2%
3.4%

Communication Services

7.2%
3.2%

Energy

4.7%
7.1%

Healthcare

4.0%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
9.1%

Utilities

2.8%
4.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
3.3%

Technology

SPEM
28.2%
SPYV
21.5%

Financial Services

SPEM
20.2%
SPYV
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEM
10.4%
SPYV
11.2%

Industrials

SPEM
8.5%
SPYV
10.8%

Basic Materials

SPEM
8.2%
SPYV
3.4%

Communication Services

SPEM
7.2%
SPYV
3.2%

Energy

SPEM
4.7%
SPYV
7.1%

Healthcare

SPEM
4.0%
SPYV
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPEM
3.9%
SPYV
9.1%

Utilities

SPEM
2.8%
SPYV
4.3%

Real Estate

SPEM
1.9%
SPYV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEM vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEM vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEMSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.33

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

12.73

-4.56

SPEM vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEM and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEM vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEMSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-58.45%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-6.22%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-17.54%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.75%

-17.89%

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-36.89%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-0.18%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-8.71%

-6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

1.63%

+1.54%

Volatility

SPEM vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.70%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEMSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

2.70%

+4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

7.26%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

9.97%

+6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

14.42%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

16.94%

+1.89%

SPEM vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEM vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than SPYV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEM and SPYV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.68% for SPYV.

SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEM and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer