PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEM vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEM vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 9.63%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.65% annualized return.


SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%

SLYV

1D
1.09%
1M
6.39%
YTD
19.47%
6M
16.63%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEM vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
19.47%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEM and SLYV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.64

The correlation between SPEM and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEM vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEM
SLYV

Technology

32.1%
13.4%

Financial Services

19.2%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
15.4%

Industrials

8.3%
11.6%

Basic Materials

8.0%
6.9%

Communication Services

6.7%
4.4%

Energy

4.2%
7.0%

Healthcare

3.7%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.8%

Utilities

2.8%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
8.6%

Technology

SPEM
32.1%
SLYV
13.4%

Financial Services

SPEM
19.2%
SLYV
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEM
9.6%
SLYV
15.4%

Industrials

SPEM
8.3%
SLYV
11.6%

Basic Materials

SPEM
8.0%
SLYV
6.9%

Communication Services

SPEM
6.7%
SLYV
4.4%

Energy

SPEM
4.2%
SLYV
7.0%

Healthcare

SPEM
3.7%
SLYV
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPEM
3.6%
SLYV
3.8%

Utilities

SPEM
2.8%
SLYV
2.1%

Real Estate

SPEM
1.8%
SLYV
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEM vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEM vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEMSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

4.20

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

13.96

-5.80

SPEM vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEM and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEM vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than SLYV's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEMSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-61.15%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-9.36%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-28.68%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.75%

-28.68%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-47.73%

+11.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

0.00%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-8.93%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.82%

+0.35%

Volatility

SPEM vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.81%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEMSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

4.81%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

11.59%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

18.31%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

21.97%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

23.96%

-5.13%

SPEM vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEM vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than SLYV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEM and SLYV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SLYV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.65% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.75% for SLYV.

SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEM and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer