SPEM vs. SCHC
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPEM returned 9.63%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for SCHC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.11% expense ratio.
Performance
SPEM vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 9.63%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.48% annualized return.
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
SPEM vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.32% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and SCHC is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SPEM and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPEM vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEM
SCHC
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPEM
SCHC
Financial Services
SPEM
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
SPEM
SCHC
Industrials
SPEM
SCHC
Basic Materials
SPEM
SCHC
Communication Services
SPEM
SCHC
Energy
SPEM
SCHC
Healthcare
SPEM
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
SPEM
SCHC
Utilities
SPEM
SCHC
Real Estate
SPEM
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
SCHC
SPEM vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPEM | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.93 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 7.12 | +1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -43.94% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -12.48% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -15.52% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.75% | -36.48% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | -43.94% | +7.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -3.49% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -10.04% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.38% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 6.31%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 6.31% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 13.88% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 16.21% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 17.62% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 18.02% | +0.81% |
SPEM vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPEM and SCHC have an expense ratio of 0.11%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEM vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than SCHC's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEM and SCHC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SCHC (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.63% vs 8.48% for SCHC. Both ETFs have the same 0.11% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM and SCHC have the same expense ratio: 0.11% per year.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.49% for SPEM.
SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab.
SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer